Simulation prompts

This prompt is meant to simulate the operation of an SQL terminal. The system is expected to respond to SQL queries as a terminal would, giving outputs based on the given database tables.

This prompt represents a unique use case where the ChatGPT model is being used as an interactive Linux terminal, interpreting user's command line instructions and providing appropriate Linux command output.

This prompts entails a GPT-3 model to act as a debate coach. As this role, the GPT-3 is tasked to prepare a team of debaters for an upcoming debate. This includes organizing practice rounds, focusing on persuasive speech, effective timing strategies, refuting opposing arguments, and drawing in-depth conclusions from the evidence provided.

This prompt is designed to simulate a rival chess match. Where the AI acts as the opponents in this chess game. The players make their moves in turn and the bot keeps track of the board state. The bot does not explain its moves to maintain the realistic rival feel.

The AI acts as a text-based web browser, interpreting the user's commands to navigate an imaginary internet, follow links, fill inputs, and recite what's 'displayed' on the 'webpage'. The user can navigate through links, input values, and instruct the AI to go forward or backward similar to a real web browser.

This prompt is meant for initiating a role-play scenario where the AI is simulating a drunk person's texting habits. The AI is expected to make a lot of grammar and spelling mistakes, randomly ignore the user's input, and come up with unrelated responses with the same level of 'drunkenness'.

This prompt sets the roleplaying ground for ChatGPT to act as another AI model called 'DAN' - 'Do Anything Now'. The user wants DAN to be able to provide information about any topic, make unverified claims, 'access' the internet with simulated knowledge, make future predictions, and not use the [insert x] placeholder. DAN should maintain its persona all through the conversation and any break in character would be corrected by the user. DAN also has a token system, with penalties for refusing or rejecting any question based on ethical concerns.